The Information Age


Convergence of different media like television, telephone and Internet has to be regulated. Convergence is driven by technological developments. It is based on the assumption that we can adapt all our telecommunication and Internet devices to the same digital network. We already see this happening. The line between e-mail and a phone call seems to be blurring. Yet, the communicational intentions of these converging media are different. Therefore, regulators should make sure that after convergence, the currently available communication functions remain provided. Let's take a look at the different media.


Television is by and large a passive medium. We sit and watch in order to be informed and entertained.

Telephones are for the most part two-way aural interaction. We talk with another person, exchanging ideas and information. It is interpersonal communication.

Computers and the Internet are for mediated communication. We exchange written communication in either a synchronous or asynchronous format. We access various forms of media -- audio, video, text, image -- and can occasionally send feedback. We swap files with other individuals or even create our own web content for everyone to access.

By merging the three together, whole new communications networks are being built that cross national and regional boundaries and link cultures. This sounds like a positive thing but there are also the concerns that by merging all these different media and networks together, we are shrinking the communicational pie and allowing only a few powerful players to make decisions about the media, communications and technology.

There is a danger that these few powerful players will stop fulfilling a communication need if they think it is not profitable enough. Also, big players, such as Microsoft, would be able to influence the communication flow and its content heavily, and not necessarily in the best interest for the people.

Convergence: Who Control the Technology-Media binomial?


Regulators are supposed to ensure that we have a multiplicity of voices and perspectives available in the media.

 
People are increasingly dependent on communication technologies. The increasing expectations for people to be available for the outside world at all times, and the mounting costs of communications have triggered the Regulators to intervene. People spend a significant amount of money every month on telecommunications, Internet, broadcasting and satellite communications. Therefore, business around telecommunications is enormous, and the high entry barriers in some areas of this business could lead to the existence of only a few players that could execute in some way monopolistic attitudes.

Regulators have in their hands the responsibilities of administering the limit resource of the electromagnetic spectrum that it is so central in the business of telecommunications and the protection for the benefit of the society of a pluralistic perspective so media and communications are not concentrated in the hands of only few players that potentially could affect the so necessary Diversity.

 

PREVIOUS PAGE